Model-year record

2012 Mazda CX-9
See the complaints, recalls, crash rating, and fuel economy in the public record. Then check the mileage and history of the car you found.
This page shows records, not a buy or avoid call.
The same model year can include a well-kept car and a neglected one. Use these records to plan what to check. Use the specific-car check when you know the mileage.
Complaints filed
221
Reports to NHTSA, 2012
Safety recalls
4
NHTSA campaigns on record
NHTSA crash test
Not rated
Overall NCAP rating
Combined MPG
19
EPA estimate
Known issues
Service Brakes issues lead owner complaints (59% of 221 reports), followed by air bags (10%).
+ 8 more component categories with fewer reports.
Share of all 221 NHTSA complaints for this model year, grouped by the component owners named. Bars are scaled to the largest category. Examples: ODI 11446811, ODI 11078853, ODI 11547325, ODI 11508193, ODI 11480067.
Individual complaint reports(221)
Showing the 50 most recent reportsVehicle Speed ControlJun 2025 · ODI 11665737Details +Close −
While drive i feel like there is sticking something below the car when i am accelerating. And the acceleration became hard. Also i heard a weird noise at that time. Then a saw a leakage below my car.
- Reported
- Jun 2025
- Incident date
- Jun 2025
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Air BagsFeb 2025 · ODI 11640738Details +Close −
My driver and passenger side curtain airbags randomly deployed without a collision. Thankfully I was at a stop sign when this happened. If it happened while I was driving, I’m sure I would have wrecked and could possibly be dead. It was loud! I thought I’d been shot or that I’d driven over a bomb. We did take the car to someone that’s certified in airbags and it was stated that this was due to a manufacturer’s defect. I also have lots of pictures. There was no warning when the airbags deployed. Mazda is refusing any responsibility due to the car being outside of the warranty.
- Reported
- Feb 2025
- Incident date
- Jan 2025
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
SteeringSep 2024 · ODI 11614843Details +Close −
Ball joints replaced due to tear in both rubber covers and driver side ball joint very loose. Was previously repaired in July 2015 under recall Number: 15V451000.
- Reported
- Sep 2024
- Incident date
- Sep 2024
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesSep 2023 · ODI 11547325Details +Close −
I was driving normally when I started sowing down and noticed the brakes were harder to push. I finally stopped just before almost rear-ending a vehicle in front of me. It turns out the brake booster, a known problem that was not communicated to me a few years ago, failed and makes braking the vehicle harder, increases distance, and makes the vehicle unsafe to drive. The problem has been reproduced via a diagnostic test at Mazda of Gladstone dealership on 9/27/23. The dealership has been the only people who have inspected the issue. There were no warning signs, no warning lights, nothing. It was scary because I didn't think my vehicle was going to stop. It's completely dangerous. I have not gotten the vehicle repaired yet because I believe Mazda holds responsibility as this has been a known issue with their cars.
- Reported
- Sep 2023
- Incident date
- Sep 2023
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Power TrainJul 2023 · ODI 11534076Details +Close −
The water pump suddenly started leaking and the mechanics I talk to said this is a very common problem with this vehicle and type of engine. Sounds like owners are left to foot the bill for this costly and difficult repair of a defective product. Hopefully more owners come forward and report their experience in this regard
- Reported
- Jul 2023
- Incident date
- Jul 2023
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
SuspensionJul 2023 · ODI 11532135 · crashDetails +Close −
The contact owns a 2012 Mazda CX9. The contact stated that the vehicle had previously been involved in a crash due to a fractured passenger's side lower control arm. The dealer was made aware of the failure and confirmed that the vehicle had been repaired under NHTSA Campaign Number: 15V451000 (Suspension). The dealer referred the contact to the manufacturer for assistance. An independent mechanic replaced the passenger's side lower control arm; however, the contact stated that after the repair was performed, the engine rattled and the vehicle stalled. The vehicle was then taken back to the independent mechanic, who determined that the driver's side lower control arm spacers were missing and that the front and rear axles, brakes, and rear shocks needed to be replaced. Additionally, the cage bolts needed to be retightened. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure, and a case was opened. The failure mileage was approximately 110,000.
- Reported
- Jul 2023
- Incident date
- Feb 2023
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- Crash
Seat BeltsFeb 2023 · ODI 11509608Details +Close −
The contact owns a 2012 Mazda CX-9. The contact stated that on several occasions while driving at various speeds, the front passenger’s side seat belt was tightening intermittently causing discomfort for the front seat passenger. There was no warning light illuminated. The vehicle had not yet been taken to an independent mechanic or a local dealer to be diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 175,000.
- Reported
- Feb 2023
- Incident date
- Dec 2022
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesFeb 2023 · ODI 11508193Details +Close −
On August 14, 2020, the brake booster along with the master cylinder failed, resulting in very dangerous and frightening driving conditions, and the parts were replaced with Mazda original parts. This was an ongoing issue with the Mazda CX-9’s. I reported it to the NHTSA, complaint number 11480067. On January 4, 2023, the brake master cylinder and booster failed again resulting again in very dangerous and frightening driving conditions. The car was driven only 25,383 miles before the brakes failed the second time. The Mazda parts were defective and continue to be so after many years with no effort by Mazda to improve these parts. Attached are the repair invoices for both incidents. I have tried contacting Mazda and they refuse to address the issue.
- Reported
- Feb 2023
- Incident date
- Jan 2023
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
SteeringOct 2022 · ODI 11491291Details +Close −
After hearing low rumbling sound and smelling burnt oil, car was taken to dealer for check up. They informed me of known issue, front PTU leaking oil due to design flaw that put the PTU so close to the exhaust. I am seeing that other owners of this model are also reporting fires due this same exact problem, apparently unbeknownst to me Mazda has provided extended warranty up to 90k miles but not actually informed the owners of this as a potential catastrophic problem. my personal review has informed me that fire seem to be most common between 110,000 and 130,000 mile ranges.
- Reported
- Oct 2022
- Incident date
- Oct 2022
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesAug 2022 · ODI 11480067Details +Close −
The brakes suddenly became very difficult to press as if I did not have power brakes. No warning lights came on and it became very difficult to stop the car. Then if I had to break suddenly and hard it would stall. I brought it to the repair shop and the brake booster was defective. The brake booster along with the master cylinder had to be replaced. It was a very dangerous and frightening experience the brakes suddenly difficult to use. I contacted Mazda customer service and they did not care. I then tried to escalate the issue over the last two years but it was impossible to contact anyone and all emails came back undeliverable. I just recently learned that I can report this danger to the NHTSA.
- Reported
- Aug 2022
- Incident date
- Aug 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Unknown Or OtherAug 2022 · ODI 11478977Details +Close −
Vehicle completely shuts off while driving making it hard to turn the steering wheel and apply brakes. Vehicle is able to be turned back on shortly after. Does this randomly. Probably 2 x within a 3-6 month period
- Reported
- Aug 2022
- Incident date
- Aug 2022
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesJun 2022 · ODI 11470024Details +Close −
Brake power boost failure
- Reported
- Jun 2022
- Incident date
- Jun 2022
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesMar 2022 · ODI 11458648Details +Close −
This is relating to NHTSA Investigation PE 14-005. Although this car is a 2012 Mazda CX9, my wife driving the car had the same issue where she heard a hissing noise and the brakes were very difficult for her to depress or to stop. A brake issue is a major defect where the NHTSA should have initiated a recall in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 30118-30120, which required notification of all owners. Why the NHTSA allowed Mazda to only issue a 'Special Extended Warranty' is beyond me, and smells of a back door deal. Nonetheless, I was unaware of this issue with the Mazda CX9's as I was never notified. My wife drove the vehicle home and I purchased the replacement parts at my own expense. This should be a full recall and should be reopened as your current investigation PE 14-005 only included years 2010-2011, and did *not* include the 2012 model year.
- Reported
- Mar 2022
- Incident date
- Mar 2017
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesJan 2022 · ODI 11446811 · crashDetails +Close −
I was driving along the highway and traffic began to slow. I pushed the brakes and the car did not stop.
- Reported
- Jan 2022
- Incident date
- Jan 2022
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- Crash
EngineJan 2022 · ODI 11446582Details +Close −
CAR IDELS UP AT STOP SIGNS
- Reported
- Jan 2022
- Incident date
- Jan 2022
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesOct 2021 · ODI 11435560 · 1 injuriesDetails +Close −
Brake booster failure caused a near miss. Wife driving with 5 year old daughter in the vehicle. The stopping force required on the brake pedal became excessive and the stopping (safe braking) distance significantly increased causing emotional distress. My understanding is this part (brake booster) has a defective diaphragm that deteriorates over time. The extended warranty created for this particular issue did not cover the vehicle at the time of the failure.
- Reported
- Oct 2021
- Incident date
- Sep 2021
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- 1 injuries
Service BrakesOct 2021 · ODI 11435469Details +Close −
BRAKE BOOSTER INTERNAL FAILURE - This is a known issue and a safety hazard on Mazda CX 9 models and should be investigated again regardless of the age of the vehicle.
- Reported
- Oct 2021
- Incident date
- Oct 2021
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesAug 2021 · ODI 11427415Details +Close −
The contact owns a 2012 Mazda CX-9. The contact stated while driving 25 mph and approaching a stop sign, depressing the brake pedal the vehicle failed to stop. The contact stated that there was no warning light illuminated. The contact stated that she pumped the brake pedal and shifted to neutral until the vehicle came to a stop. The contact was able to drive to her residence. The contact took the vehicle to an independent mechanic and was informed that the power brake booster and master cylinder needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired. A dealer was not contacted. The manufacturer was informed of the failure. The failure mileage was 29,805.
- Reported
- Aug 2021
- Incident date
- Jul 2021
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesApr 2021 · ODI 11414523Details +Close −
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 MAZDA CX-9. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING AT VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE VEHICLE STALLED. ADDITIONALLY, THE BRAKES FAILED TO ENGAGE WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. THERE WAS NO WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC TO BE DIAGNOSED. THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER AND BRAKE BOOSTER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE CONTACT WAS ADVISED TO REACH OUT TO THE DEALERSHIP ELDORADO CHEVROLET(233 N CENTRAL EXPWY, MCKINNEY, TX 75070). THE CONTACT WANTED A SECOND OPINION AND THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO ELDORADO CHEVROLET (2300 N CENTRAL EXPY, MCKINNEY, TX 75070) WHERE IT WAS ALSO DIAGNOSED WITH THE MASTER CYLINDER AND BRAKE BOOSTER NEEDING TO BE REPLACED. THE SVC MGR INFORMED CONSUMER HE WOULDNT ADVISED ANYONE TO DRIVE THE VEHICLE UNTIL REPAIRS WERE MADE. DUE TO INCORRECT TITLE WORK THE DEALER REFUNDED SOME MONEY AND TOOK POSESSION OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 110,000. THE CONSUMER STATED THE VEHICLE WAS PUT BACK ON THE LOT FOR RESALE. THE CONSUMER CONTACTED A LAWYER AND VEHICLE WAS TAKEN OFF THE LOT BUT CARFAX WAS NOT UPDATED WITH CORRECT INFORMATION.
- Reported
- Apr 2021
- Incident date
- Apr 2021
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Vehicle Speed ControlFeb 2021 · ODI 11397387 · crashDetails +Close −
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 MAZDA CX-9. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 5 MPH WHILE PULLING INTO A PARKING SPACE, THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY EXPERIENCED UNINTENDED ACCELERATION AND DROVE FORWARD CRASHING INTO A WOODEN SEATING BENCH WHICH WAS PUSHED INTO A BUILDING. DURING THE INCIDENT THE DRIVERS FOOT WAS PRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL. NO INJURIES WERE REPORTED. A POLICE REPORT WAS TAKEN AT THE SCENE AND THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED AWAY. THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS NOT YET DETERMINED. THE MANUFACTURER AND LOCAL DEALER WAS NOT NOTIFIED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 112,000. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE.
- Reported
- Feb 2021
- Incident date
- Feb 2021
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- Crash
Air BagsDec 2020 · ODI 11385219 · 2 injuriesDetails +Close −
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 MAZDA CX-9. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING OVER A SPEED BUMP AT APPROXIMATELY 5 MPH BOTH THE FRONT AND REAR DRIVER SIDE AND PASSENGER SIDE CURTAIN AIRBAGS HAD ERRONEOUSLY DEPLOYED WITH OUT ANY IMPACT OCCURRING TO THE VEHICLE. DURING THE INCIDENT BOTH THE FRONT AND PASSENGER SIDE SEAT BELTS HAD ALSO ACTIVATED AND DEPLOYED TO SECURE THE OCCUPANTS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE LOCAL DEALER JOE MAUS MAZDA LOCATED AT 6735 E INDEPENDENCE BLVD, CHARLOTTE, NC WHO REPLACED THE AIRBAGS AND SEAT BELTS. THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS NOT DETERMINED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FRONT PASSENGER AND DRIVER BOTH SUSTAINED MINOR NECK AND BACK INJURIES DURING THE INCIDENT. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 126,417.
- Reported
- Dec 2020
- Incident date
- Dec 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- 2 injuries
Service BrakesNov 2020 · ODI 11372953Details +Close −
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 MAZDA CX-9. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING AT APPROXIMATELY 20 MPH, THE BRAKES FAILED TO OPERATE. THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT THE BRAKES GRADUALLY SLOWED DOWN THE VEHICLE AND STOP INDEPENDENTLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHERE THEY INFORMED THE CONTACT THAT THERE WAS AN UNKNOWN RECALL ON THE VEHICLE. THE CONTACT CONTACTED RILEY MAZDA (75 MYRTLE AVE, STAMFORD, CT 06902, (203) 978-5780) AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE VIN WAS NOT UNDER RECALL. THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED OF AN EXTENDED WARRANTY COVERAGE HOWEVER, THE MILEAGE HAD BEEN EXCEEDED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 129,000.
- Reported
- Nov 2020
- Incident date
- Nov 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesOct 2020 · ODI 11365716Details +Close −
I WAS DRIVING SLOWLY ABOUT 30MIPH AND BEGAN HEARING A HISSING NOISE WHEN I DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL. ONCE I PULLED INTO MY DRIVEWAY A SMALL INCLINE, AND PUSHED THE BRAKE PEDAL IT WAS VERY TIGHT AND STOPPED AT A POINT, BUT WOULD NOT GO FURTHER, TRIED SHIFTING DIFFERENT GEARS. FINALLY BRAKE DEPRESSED. HISSING HAS CONTINUES, VERY STIFF BRAKE PEDAL
- Reported
- Oct 2020
- Incident date
- Oct 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesOct 2020 · ODI 11365802Details +Close −
I WAS ON THE INTERSTATE (DRIVING 60+MPH) AND THE CAR IN FRONT OF ME SLAMMED ON THEIR BRAKES FOR AN UNKNOWN REASON. I TRIED TO USE MY BRAKES BUT THEY WERE ROCK HARD AND THE PEDAL WOULDN'T DEPRESS. I WAS FORCED TO SWERVE TO THE RIGHT, STILL HAVING NO BRAKES, AND BARELY MADE IT OVER 3 LANES TO THE SHOULDER OF THE ROAD. IN DOING SO, I CAUSED TOTAL CHAOS AROUND ME, CAUSED A TRACTOR TRAILER TO START TO JACKKNIFE, WHICH CAUSED A CHAIN REACTION BEHIND HIM. IT WAS A TOTAL MIRACLE THAT NO ACCIDENTS WERE CAUSED AND NO ONE WAS KILLED. I CALLED MY MECHANIC FROM THE SIDE OF THE ROAD, HYSTERICAL. HE LOOKED IN HIS DATABASE AND FOUND THAT MAZDA HAD KNOWN ISSUES WITH THEIR POWER BRAKE BOOSTER. I SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND A LETTER FROM MAZDA INSTRUCTING OWNERS "IF YOUR VEHICLE IS FUNCTIONING PROPERLY, THERE IS NO NEED TO CONTACT YOUR DEALER." ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? MY BRAKES WERE FINE UNTIL THEY WEREN'T, THEN I NARROWLY AVOIDED BEING KILLED OR CAUSING THE DEATH OF ANOTHER BECAUSE APPARENTLY MAZDA'S BODY COUNT WASN'T HIGH ENOUGH TO ISSUE A RECALL.
- Reported
- Oct 2020
- Incident date
- Apr 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
SuspensionOct 2020 · ODI 11362386Details +Close −
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 MAZDA CX9. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING AT AN UNDISCLOSED SPEED, THE VEHICLE SHUT-OFF WITH AN UNKNOWN WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO TWO INDEPENDENT MECHANICS WHO DIAGNOSED THAT WATER ENTERED THE VEHICLE AND CAUSED THE CORROSION OF THE FRONT SUSPENSION BALL JOINT. THE DEALER WAS NOT CALLED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 83,000.
- Reported
- Oct 2020
- Incident date
- Aug 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
EngineSep 2020 · ODI 11361709Details +Close −
MY WIFE WAS DRIVING DOWN A CITY STREET WHEN THE CAR COMPLETELY SHUT DOWN AND LOST ALL POWER. LUCKILY, SHE WAS ABLE TO STOP WITHOUT CAUSING AN ACCIDENT. WE HAD CAR TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC. AFTER INSPECTION WE WERE TOLD THE WATER PUMP HAD FAILED CAUSING COOLANT TO LEAK INTO THE ENGINE AND CAUSED COMPLETE ENGINE FAILURE. WE WERE QUOTED $8K-$10K TO REPLACE THE ENGINE. THE 2012 MAZDA CX-9 ONLY HAD 99K MILES, BUT UNFORTUNATELY OUR EXTENDED WARRANTY EXPIRED A FEW YEARS AGO, SO MAZDA WAS OF NO HELP. WE WERE LEFT TO JUNK OUR CAR FOR A FRACTION OF WHAT IT'S VALUE SHOULD HAVE BEEN. APPARENTLY THIS IS A KNOWN ISSUE AND WE WILL BE JOINING THE CURRENT CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST MAZDA.
- Reported
- Sep 2020
- Incident date
- Sep 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesSep 2020 · ODI 11355179Details +Close −
BRAKE BOOSTER ON VEHICLE WENT OUT WHILE DRIVING, HARD TO ENGAGE BRAKE AND SLOW VEHICLE TO A STOP.
- Reported
- Sep 2020
- Incident date
- Aug 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesSep 2020 · ODI 11353788Details +Close −
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 MAZDA CX-9. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING, AND MAKING A TURN AT 5 MPH, THE BRAKES WERE SQUISHY AND THE VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP. THERE WERE NO WARNING LIGHTS ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO BOB MOORE MAZDA (13045 N. KELLEY AVE, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73131 (405) 775-7000) TO BE DIAGNOSED. THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND STATED THAT THE EXTENDED WARRANTY HAD EXPIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 75,000.
- Reported
- Sep 2020
- Incident date
- Sep 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesAug 2020 · ODI 11351038Details +Close −
WHILE PULLING INTO MY GARAGE AT LOW SPEED, MY POWER BRAKES FAILED. I HAD TO PRACTICALLY STAND ON THE BREAK PEDAL TO GET THE VEHICLE TO STOP, BARELY STOPPING BEFORE HITTING THE FRIDGE IN MY GARAGE.THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED FOR SERVICE AND THE PROBLEM DIAGNOSED AS THE FAILURE OF THE BRAKE VACUUM BOOSTER.
- Reported
- Aug 2020
- Incident date
- Jul 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesJul 2020 · ODI 11339922Details +Close −
BRAKE PEDAL HAS BECOME HARDER THAN USUAL TO DEPRESS AND THE CAR DOES NOT START STOPPING UNTIL THE BRAKE PEDAL IS DEPRESSED HARDER AND FURTHER DOWN. ALSO THERE IS A HISSING NOISE ONCE THE CAR STOPS AND THE BRAKE PEDAL GOES FURTHER TO THE FLOORBOARD. ONCE STOPPED AND SITTING THE CAR WILL LURCH AS IF IT HAS BEEN HIT IN THE REAR END. THIS ALL HAPPENS ON ANY TYPE OF ROADWAY. THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR ABOUT TWO MONTHS AND GETTING MORE PRONOUNCED.
- Reported
- Jul 2020
- Incident date
- Jun 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesJul 2020 · ODI 11339494Details +Close −
WHEN APPLYING BRAKE, HEAR HISSING SOUND DOWN AT FEET. HARD TO STOP, FEELS LIKE PEDAL IS PUSHING BACK. THIS HAPPENS AT ALL SPEEDS, EVEN WHEN PUTTING CAR INTO GEAR FROM PARK. IT HAS BEEN ONGOING FOR ABOUT 2 WEEKS. MECHANIC ADVISED IT IS THE BRAKE BOOSTER.
- Reported
- Jul 2020
- Incident date
- Jul 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesJul 2020 · ODI 11337646Details +Close −
I WAS DRIVING HOME WITH THE FAMILY AFTER VIEWING SOME HOUSE. EVERY TIME I WOULD STEP ON THE BRAKE PEDAL I WOULD HEAR A HISSING FROM THE BRAKE. BEEN HAPPENING FOR ABOUT A MONTH NOW BUT, WITH THE PANDEMIC GOING ON I JUST DON'T HAVE TIME TO DIAGNOSE THE PROBLEM. WHEN I PRESS ON THE BRAKE IT WOULD STOP LIKE NORMAL WITH AIR HISSING. THE NEXT DAY THE BRAKE PEDAL WOULD FEEL VERY HARD TO PRESS DOWN. LIKE AS IF YOU BEEN PUMPING YOUR BRAKE WHEN THE CAR OFF AND WHEN YOU TURN YOUR CAR ON THE PRESSURE WOULD BE RELEASED. NOT TODAY, IT STAYED HARD AND HARD TO STOP. I HAD TO PRESS THE BRAKE VERY HARD AS IF PRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE FLOOR TO MAKE THE CAR STOP. JUST STOPPING AT A RED LIGHT, STOP SIGN, OFF THE HIGHWAY, AND TRAFFIC WAS A CHALLENGE. I'LL EVENTUALLY STOP BUT IN THE MIDDLE OF A INTERSECTION OR IN THE BACK OF A CAR. IF I HAD TO BRAKE BECAUSE SOMEONE TURNED IN FRONT OF ME, I WOULD OF JUST HIT THEM FULL SPEED BECAUSE MY BRAKE BOOSTER FAILURE TO PRODUCE ENOUGH PRESSURE TO ENGAGE MY BRAKES TO STOP. THE DAY THE BRAKE BOOSTER HAPPEN TO FAILURE COMPLETELY IS WHEN WE HAD A FAMILY TRIP DOWN TO THE WISCONSIN DELLS OVER THE JULY 4TH WEEKEND. SINCE BRAKE BOOSTER WASN'T A RECALL BUT AN EXTENDED WARRANTY AND ENDED MARCH 2015 OR 90,000 MILES. MAZADA WOULD CHARGE ME FULL PRICE TO GET IT FIXED. I WOULD NOT FELL SAFE DRIVING IT TO THE DEALER AND MAZADA DOESNT COVER TOWING UNLESS ITS WITHIN 3 YEARS. SO THEY'LL TOW ANYTHING IN THE 2017 AND NEWER. 2012 MAZADA CX-9 WITH 112,500. OWNED IT FOR EXACTLY 3 TO DATED
- Reported
- Jul 2020
- Incident date
- Jul 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesJul 2020 · ODI 11331885Details +Close −
PURCHASED FROM A CERTIFIED PRE-OWNED MAZDA DEALER....I EXPERIENCED, WITH NO WARNING, MY BRAKES BECOME HARD TO PRESS. IT HAPPENS IN REVERSE, COMING OFF CRUISE, SLOW/FAST SPEED, ETC. I HAVE TO USE AN EXTRAORDINARY AMOUNT OF EFFORT TO PRESS THE BRAKES AND BRING THE CAR TO A STOP. IF SOMEONE PULLS OUT IN FRONT OF ME, THERE IS NO GUARANTEE I WOULD BE ABLE TO OPERATE THE BRAKES QUICKLY ENOUGH TO AVOID AN ACCIDENT. I HAVE CHILDREN I TRANSPORT AND IT IS CONCERNING FOR ME AS A MOM ESPECIALLY. A FEW TIMES THE PEDAL WILL 'RELEASE' AND OPERATE NORMALLY AFTER THE EXTRA PRESSURE IS APPLIED WHICH CAUSES THE CAR TO JERK TO A STOP BECAUSE THE BRAKES WERE BEING PRESSED VERY HARD. MOST TIMES, EXTRA PRESSURE IS REQUIRED THE ENTIRE TIME. THIS IS A MAJOR SAFETY CONCERN AND AN ISSUE I AM AWARE IS COMMON IN THIS MODEL. MAZDA EXTENDED THIS WARRANTY TO 90K AND 7 YEARS BACK IN 2015; HOWEVER, THIS DOES NOT COVER USED CAR PURCHASERS. THE ISSUE WAS NOT DISCLOSED TO ME IN MY PURCHASE DATE OF 12/12/2016. HAD I KNOWN THIS MAJOR COMPONENT COULD FAIL, I WOULD HAVE MADE A MORE EDUCATED DECISION ON WHETHER TO PURCHASE OR REQUEST THE FAULTY SYSTEM BE CORRECTED.
- Reported
- Jul 2020
- Incident date
- Jun 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
EngineJul 2020 · ODI 11331950Details +Close −
IN OCT. 2019 MY CX9 STOPPED WHILE BEING DRIVEN. FOUND OUT THE WATER PUMP (WHICH IS INSIDE THE ENGINE) HAD GONE OUT AND DESTROYED MY ENGINE. THIS IS A KNOWN PROBLEM OF WHICH MAZDA HAS FAILED TO MAKE THEIR CONSUMERS AWARE. I PURCHASED THIS CARE NEW AND ALL OF MY SERVICES HAD BEEN HANDLED BY MAZDA. NO-ONE TOLD ME ABOUT THIS PROBLEM AND I STILL HAD TO PAY JUST OVER 4K TO GET A NEW ENGINE OF THE SAME STUPID DESIGN PUT IN MY CAR. THIS IS VERY DANGEROUS PROBLEM. HOW MANY MAZDA DRIVERS HAVE BEEN INJURED OR KILLED IN CRASHES BECAUSE THE WATER PUMP DESTROYED THE ENGINE ON A FREEWAY AND THE CAR CEASING TO MOVE WAS THE CAUSE OF AN ACCIDENT THAT TOTALED THE CAR AND AS A RESULT WENT UNDETECTED? THE ENGINES NEED TO BE RECALLED.
- Reported
- Jul 2020
- Incident date
- Oct 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Power TrainJun 2020 · ODI 11330274Details +Close −
11/1/2016- AT 92,205 MILES VEHICLE SHUDDERED WHEN I STEPPED ON ACCELERATOR. I WAS TOLD IT WAS TRANSMISSION RELATED. ON MY WAY TO MECHANIC VEHICLE COMPLETELY SEIZED; HAD TO HAVE IT TOWED TO TRANSMISSION SHOP. ANGLE GEAR HAD TO BE REPLACED BECAUSE TRANSFER CASE OIL BURNED OFF BECAUSE CATALYTIC CONVERTER IS PLACED TOO CLOSE AND IT COOKS LUBRICANT. I WAS TOLD THIS IS A KNOWN PROBLEM WITH MAZDA CX9'S. COST 1,400. MAZDA WAS UNWILLING TO COVER REPAIRS AT ALL. 6/22/2020 - 130,000 MILES SAME SHUDDERING HAPPENED WHEN STEPPED ON ACCELERATOR AND SAME ISSUE. CALLED MAZDA AND SAME RESPONSE 'NOT OUR PROBLEM, IT'S OUT OF WARRANTY'. *TR
- Reported
- Jun 2020
- Incident date
- Nov 2016
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesApr 2020 · ODI 11322716Details +Close −
I AM NOW EXPERIENCING WHAT MAZDA MAILED OWNERS PREVIOUSLY (SEE ATTACHED SSP93 OWNERS NOTICE) REGARDING "POWER BRAKE UNIT WARRANTY EXTENSION PROGRAM SSP 93 2007-2013 MAZDA CX-9". I STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE SINCE I FIND MYSELF RUNNING STOP SIGNS WHEN I TRY TO STOP THE VEHICLE AT AN INTERSECTION. I KNOW THAT MAZDA EXTENDED THE WARRANTY TO 7 YEARS ON IT'S SSP93 BULLETIN. BUT WHAT HAPPENS TO OWNERS LIKE MYSELF WHO DO NOT FALL WITHIN THAT TIME-FRAME AND ARE NOW EXPERIENCING THIS SAFETY ISSUE? IT IS UNCONSCIONABLE, THAT SINCE MAZDA HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THIS PROBLEM, THAT THE OWNER LIKE MYSELF GETS STUCK WITH THIS SAFETY PROBLEM CONCERNING FAILURE OF THE BRAKING SYSTEM ON THE CX-9. PLEASE ADVISE. THANKS.
- Reported
- Apr 2020
- Incident date
- Apr 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Unknown Or OtherApr 2020 · ODI 11322571Details +Close −
THE PASSENGER AUTOMATIC WINDOW MOTOR AND CONTROL STOPPED WORKING. THE CAR WAS MOVING ON A HIGHWAY WHEN IT STOPPED WORKING
- Reported
- Apr 2020
- Incident date
- Mar 2020
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesJan 2020 · ODI 11299163Details +Close −
AS THE CAR WAS BEING DRIVEN THE BREAKS BECAME HARD AND UNLESS PRESSED VERY HARD IT KEEPS GOING. IT DOESN'T GO DOWN AT ALL. ASSESSMENT SHOWS BRAKE BOOSTER FAILURE. IT IS WEIRD OTHER VEHICLE I HAD ...A TOYOTA NEVER FAILED. I CAN'T DRIVE IT.
- Reported
- Jan 2020
- Incident date
- Oct 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
EngineJan 2020 · ODI 11298365Details +Close −
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 MAZDA CX-9. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING AT VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE VEHICLE STALLED WITHOUT WARNING. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO KENNEDY MAZDA LOCATED AT 1411 RIDGE PIKE, CONSHOHOCKEN, PA 19428, (610)272-0700, TO BE DIAGNOSED. THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE ENGINE WAS DAMAGED DUE TO A WATER PUMP FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED BACK TO THE HOME AND LATER REPAIRED BY AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC HOWEVER, THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 109,000. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE.
- Reported
- Jan 2020
- Incident date
- Jun 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
SteeringOct 2019 · ODI 11267063Details +Close −
DRIVING ON RTE 3 N IN BRAINTREE. CAR WAS DECELERATING WHILE I HAD MY FOOT ON GAS. LOST STEERING AND BARELY MADE IT TO BRAKE DOWN LANE. THIS CAR HAS 72K MILES ON IT. NEEDS NEW ENGINE.
- Reported
- Oct 2019
- Incident date
- Aug 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesSep 2019 · ODI 11258742Details +Close −
BRAKE BOOSTER FAILED. THIS IS A KNOWN ISSUE TO MAZDA. MAZDA SAID TO BRING INTO DEALER FOR ASSESSMENT AND CONSIDERATION FOR GOODWILL WARRANTY REPLACEMENT. DEALER DETERMINED BRAKE BOOSTER FAILED AND MAZDA THEN DENIED GOODWILL CLAIM. I PAID DEALER TO FIX THE ISSUE. THIS IS A MAJOR SAFETY ISSUE AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN RECALLED, NOT GRANTED AN EXTENDED WARRANTY.
- Reported
- Sep 2019
- Incident date
- Sep 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesSep 2019 · ODI 11254799Details +Close −
POWER BOOSTER HIGH PITCH SOUND WHEN PRESSING BRAKES AND BRAKES ARE HARD WHEN PRESSED THEN GO SOFT AND HARD TO STOP THE CAR.
- Reported
- Sep 2019
- Incident date
- Sep 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesAug 2019 · ODI 11245713Details +Close −
2012 MAZDA CX-9. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO BRAKE POWER BOOST UNIT FAILURE. *LD THE CONSUMER STATED THAT WHEN PRESSING THE BREAK PEDAL THERE IS A HISSING AND THUNK NOISE. THE ENGINE WOULD STALL. THE DEALERSHIP AND MANUFACTURER WERE NOTIFIED, BUT DENIED ASSISTANCE.*JS
- Reported
- Aug 2019
- Incident date
- May 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesJul 2019 · ODI 11232385Details +Close −
BRAKE PEDAL ACTION FEELS SPONGY, SOFT. REQUIRES EXTRA FORCE TO STOP THE CAR WHEN MOVING ON CITY STREETS.
- Reported
- Jul 2019
- Incident date
- Jul 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesJul 2019 · ODI 11230738Details +Close −
WHEN PUSHING THE BRAKES THE PEDAL IS 'HARD' AS IF THE PEDAL WAS ON THE FLOOR THERE'S A HISSING NOISE LIKE AIR IS LEAKING. IF YOU NEED TO MAKE A SUDDEN STOP IT DOES NOT HAPPEN THE BRAKES ARE SO HARD THE CAR WON'T STOP!! THIS DEFECT HAPPENED SUDDENLY THERE WAS NO GRADUAL WARNING !
- Reported
- Jul 2019
- Incident date
- Jun 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Service BrakesJul 2019 · ODI 11230297Details +Close −
SO DISAPPOINTED IN NHTSA FOR NOT REQUIRING MAZDA TO RECALL THE BRAKE BOOSTER FAILURE! NHTSA'S INVESTIGATION INTO THE BRAKE BOOSTER FAILURE WAS CLOSED WHEN MAZDA AGREED TO AN EXTENDED WARRANTY FOR THIS MANUFACTURING SAFETY DEFECT. HAD THE NHTSA PUSHED FOR A RECALL NOTICE, WE WOULD HAVE BEEN ALERTED TO THIS SAFETY DEFECT AND COULD HAVE HAD IT REPAIRED (IT IS KNOWN TO FAIL AROUND 62,000 MILES). WE CONTACTED MAZDA TODAY ABOUT THE WARRANTY ONLY TO BE TOLD OUR VEHICLE WARRANTY EXPIRED LESS THAN 3 MONTHS AGO, RESULTING IN MAZDA'S REFUSAL TO COVER A KNOWN SAFETY DEFECT. MAZDA'S LACK OF COMMITMENT TO RESOLVING THIS SAFETY ISSUE IS SHOCKING. NHTSA'S ACCEPTANCE OF MAZDA EXTENDING ITS WARRANTY FOR THIS KNOWN SAFETY ISSUE IS DISHEARTENING AS WELL. A MANUFACTURING DEFECT IS A MANUFACTURING DEFECT; THE PROBLEM SHOULD HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED WHEN IT FAILED OR, AT THE VERY LEAST, RECALLED AND REPLACED. A TIME LIMIT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN AN OPTION FOR A SAFETY ISSUE (OR AN OUT FOR MAZDA). PERHAPS IT IS TIME FOR NHTSA TO REOPEN ITS INVESTIGATION TO PROTECT THE CONSUMERS AGAINST A KNOWN SAFETY DEFECT. MAZDA CERTAINLY DOESN'T BACK IT'S PRODUCT WHEN IT COMES TO SAFETY ISSUES!
- Reported
- Jul 2019
- Incident date
- Jul 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Vehicle Speed ControlJun 2019 · ODI 11218471Details +Close −
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 MAZDA CX-9. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO ACCELERATE FROM A TRAFFIC LIGHT, THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED; HOWEVER, THE VEHICLE FAILED TO RESPOND. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WERE NO WARNING INDICATORS BEFORE OR AFTER THE FAILURE. THE BRAKE PEDAL ALSO BECAME EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO DEPRESS. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO CONTINENTAL MAZDA (LOCATED AT 2363 AURORA AVE, NAPERVILLE, IL 60540, (630) 352-5900) WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT COOLANT ENTERED THE ENGINE OIL AND CAUSED THE ENGINE TO FAIL. THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE ENGINE NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED AND PROVIDED CASE NUMBER: 1-2189354066. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 52,000.
- Reported
- Jun 2019
- Incident date
- Jun 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Vehicle Speed ControlMay 2019 · ODI 11206767 · crashDetails +Close −
I WAS TURNING RIGHT INTO A PARKING SPACE WITH MY FOOT ON THE BRAKE, WHEN THE CAR SUDDENLY ACCELERATED. THE ENGINE REVVED UP AND THE CAR DARTED FORWARD. FOR A SPLIT SECOND I LIFTED MY FOOT TO MAKE SURE I WAS NOT PRESSING ON THE ACCELERATOR, AND IMMEDIATELY PUSHED BACK DOWN ON THE BRAKE AS HARD AS I COULD; THE CAR CONTINUED TO SPEED FORWARD. INSTINCTIVELY I KEPT THE WHEEL TURNED TO THE RIGHT TO AVOID CRASHING INTO THE BUILDING IN FRONT OF ME AS THE CAR JUMPED THE CURB, BUT I HIT 2 PARKED CARS. ONCE I WAS ALMOST STOPPED BY HITTING THE 2 PARKED CARS, I QUICKLY TURNED THE KEY OFF AND PUT THE CAR IN PARK. I HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED THIS ISSUE BEFORE; AND LET ME TELL YOU, I WAS TERRIFIED. I HAVE PICTURES THAT SHOW TIRE MARKS EITHER FROM THE CARS ACCELERATION OR DRAGGING THE BACK WHEELS FROM PUSHING ON THE BRAKE.
- Reported
- May 2019
- Incident date
- May 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- Crash
Service BrakesMay 2019 · ODI 11206439Details +Close −
APPLYING BRAKES FOR 1-2 SECONDS RESULTED IN NO IMMEDIATE STOPPING, ONLY RESISTANCE FROM THE PEDAL. AFTER 1-2 SECONDS, THE BRAKES WERE AGGRESSIVLY APPLIED. THIS RESULTED IN "RUNNING A STOP SIGN" AND STOPPING THE IN MIDDLE OF AN INTERSECTION. THIS OCCURRED ON A CITY STREET MULTIPLE TIMES BEFORE GETTING THE CAR TO A REPAIR SHOP. ON HIGHWAYS, BRAKING HAD TO BEGIN WELL IN ADVANCE TO AVOID POSSIBLE CRASHES. WE HAD TO HAVE THE MASTER CYLINDER AND BRAKE BOOSTER REPLACED. THE VEHICLE HAS 55K MILE ON IT.
- Reported
- May 2019
- Incident date
- May 2019
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
Electrical SystemApr 2019 · ODI 11193609Details +Close −
WE OWN A 2011 MAZDA CX7 AND A 2012 MAZDA CX9, THE MOTORS IN THE DRIVERS AND PASSENGER SIDE WINDOWS OF BOTH CARS WHEN OUT WITHIN A 6 MONTH PERIOD OF TIME. THE WARRANT ON THE CARS WERE OUT AT 36K MILES AND IN 2014. THE MOTORS BOTH STOPPED WORKING PAST THIS PERIOD TIME BUT HAVE READ THIS HAS HAPPENED ON THESE SAME VEHICLES. THE WINDOWS GO DOWN BUT START MAKING A LOUD CLICKING SOUND AND WILL NOT GO BACK UP WITH OUT HOLDING YOU HAND ON IT, CREATING A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION WITH SMALL CHILDREN.
- Reported
- Apr 2019
- Incident date
- Apr 2018
- Mileage
- Not provided
- Outcome flags
- None reported
This page shows the latest 50 reports to keep it usable. The count above includes every complaint NHTSA has returned for this model year.
Recalls(4)
Open a recall to read what NHTSA says is wrong, what can happen, and how it gets fixed. Check the VIN and remedy eligibility with a dealer; federal no-charge requirements have an age limit, though a manufacturer may offer more coverage.
Air BagsDec 2018 · 18V717000Details +Close −
Mazda North American Operations (Mazda) is recalling certain 2014-2015 Mazda CX-9 vehicles sold, or ever registered in the states of Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands or "Zone A." Additionally, unless covered in "Zone A," Mazda is recalling certain 2011-2013 Mazda6, 2011-2012 CX-7, and 2011-2015 CX-9 sold, or ever registered in the states of Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia, or "Zone B." Additionally, unless covered in Zone A or Zone B, Mazda is recalling certain 2010-2013 Mazda6, 2010-2012 CX-7, and 2010-2015 CX-9 vehicles ever registered in the states of Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming or "Zone C." These vehicles are equipped with certain air bag inflators assembled as part of the passenger frontal air bag modules used as original equipment or replacement equipment. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the passenger frontal air bag, these inflators may explode due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to absolute humidity and temperature cycling.
Risk: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Mazda will notify owners, and dealers will replace the front passenger air bag inflator with an alternate inflator, free of charge. The recall began November 9, 2018. Owners may contact Mazda customer service at 1-800-222-5500, Option 4. Mazda's number for this recall is 1317F.
Open full NHTSA recall record →Suspension · 15V451000Details +Close −
Mazda North American Operations (Mazda) is recalling certain model year 2007-2014 CX-9 vehicles manufactured October 24, 2006, to December 28, 2013. The affected vehicles have front suspension ball joints that may corrode from water leaking into the fitting.
Risk: Over time, the ball joint corrosion may result in the front lower control arm separating from the ball joint, causing a loss of steering control and increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Mazda will notify owners, and dealers will replace both the left and right lower control arms, free of charge. The recall began on September 14, 2015. The recall will begin with model year 2007-2009 vehicles registered in Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington D.C., West Virginia, and Wisconsin. The second phase will be for model year 2010-2014 vehicles in the same states. Finally, all remaining vehicles will be remedied. Owners may contact Mazda customer service at 1-800-222-5500. Mazda's number for this recall is 8515G.
Open full NHTSA recall record →Air Bags · 17V457000Details +Close −
Mazda North America Operations (Mazda) is recalling certain 2012 CX-7, CX-9 and Mazda6 vehicles sold, or ever registered, in the states of Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands, or "Zone A." Additionally, unless included in "Zone A" above, Mazda is recalling certain 2009 CX-7, CX-9 and Mazda6 vehicles sold, or ever registered in the states of Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, or "Zone B." Additionally, unless included in "Zone A" or "Zone B" above, Mazda is recalling certain 2007-2008 CX-7 and CX-9 sold, or ever registered in the states of Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. These vehicles are equipped with certain air bag inflators assembled as part of the passenger frontal air bag modules used as original equipment or replacement equipment. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the passenger frontal air bag, these inflators may rupture due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to absolute humidity and temperature cycling.
Risk: An inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Owners are advised not to drive their vehicles until the remedy is performed. Mazda will notify owners, and dealers will replace the front passenger side air bag inflator with an alternate inflator, free of charge. The recall began October 4, 2017. Owners may contact Mazda customer service at 1-800-222-5500. Mazda's number for this recall is 1317F. Note: This recall supersedes recall 17V-012.
Open full NHTSA recall record →Air Bags · 19V782000Details +Close −
Mazda North American Operations (Mazda) is recalling certain 2007-2012 CX-7, CX-9, and 2009-2012 Maza6 vehicles. These vehicles had their passenger frontal air bag inflators previously replaced under a prior recall using inflators of the same design. The inflators may explode due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to high absolute humidity, temperature and temperature cycling.
Risk: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Owners are advised not to drive their vehicles until the repair has been performed. Mazda will notify owners, and dealers will replace the front passenger air bag inflator with an alternate one, free of charge. The recall began December 3, 2019. Owners may contact Mazda customer service at 1-800-222-5500, option 4. Mazda's number for this recall is 1317F. Note: This recall supersedes recalls 16V356 and 17V012.
Open full NHTSA recall record →A campaign can apply to this model year without being incomplete on a specific vehicle. Check the VIN with NHTSA or a dealer to confirm whether a particular car needs repair.
Investigations
2 NHTSA investigations on record
Investigations are agency reviews, not findings that a vehicle is defective.
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this Preliminary Evaluation (PE19-006) on May 2, 2019 to investigate two Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQs) and Early Warning Reporting data related to allegations of inadvertent deployment (IAD) of side curtain airbags in Model Year (MY) 2010 through 2013 Mazda CX-9 vehicles. ODI sent an Information Request (IR) to Mazda North America Operations, LLC. to gather information about the alleged defect in the subject vehicles. In the 20 months since opening the PE, ODI has received three additional VOQs. To date, there have been a total of 11 IAD incidents within the identified population of 104,360 vehicles. Of the 11 incidents, no serious injuries were reported. The last known incident occurred in December 2020.Mazda's response to ODI's IR letter identified the root cause as a manufacturing issue of the Bosch SMG076 Roll Rate Sensor within the Restraint Control Module (RCM). During the manufacturing calibration process, small particles may be generated that could affect roll sensor capacitance, which could lead to a loss of curtain airbag protection or an erroneous deployment command. On November 19, 2012, a revised Roll Rate Sensor calibration process was launched, establishing a clean point for the issue. In its responses to ODI, Mazda has assessed the condition as a low risk to motor vehicle safety, with low incident frequency not warranting action. Any RCM data indicating a malfunctioning Roll Rate Sensor will result in the illumination of the airbag warning light. In the event of an erroneous curtain airbag deployment, there is no contact with properly seated occupants. Additionally, the condition is not affected by deterioration or wear, and known incidents established a random pattern of occurrence.During the investigation, ODI examined the injury risk to vehicle occupants from curtain airbag deployments. It was determined that the subject vehicles do not pose a substantial risk to out of position occupants, as testing data falls within Technical Working Group (TWG) reference values. Modeling simulation based on data provided by Mazda for properly seated occupants during static and dynamic airbag deployments indicated sufficient head clearance and no risk of brain injury. ODI analysis reveals that inadvertent deployment incident rates of curtain airbags in the subject vehicles are low through approximately ten years in service. Incident frequency does not meet values warranting recall action, but rather align closely with baseline frequency of general inadvertent deployments which are known to occur in rare driving conditions. Additionally, warranty analysis of RCM failures resulting in a loss of curtain airbag protection revealed low claim rates.Based on the analysis conducted, this investigation has been closed. The closing of this investigation does not foreclose the Agency from taking further action, if warranted, or the potential for a future finding that a safety-related defect exists, based upon additional information the Agency may receive.The five ODI complaints cited above can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under the following identification numbers: 10905492, 11165925, 11270089, 11310044, 11385219.
In an July 7,2015 letter to NHTSA, Mazda identified a safety defect that could result in lower ball joint separation in approximately 193,484 model year (MY) 2007 through 2014 Mazda CX-9 vehicles (NHTSA Recall No. 15V-451,Mazda 8515G).Mazda indicated that damage to the ball joint boot may allow water to enter the front suspension ball joint fitting during use which may result in premature ball joint wear and a progressively looser joint.In January 2014, Mazda implemented redesigned lower control arms in production vehicles to improve the durability of the lower ball joints.The redesign involved changing the shape of the top surface of the ball joint boot cover and adding a suspension plate to the undersurface of the knuckle.Mazda's recall will replace the defect lower control arms with the redesigned parts.ODI's analysis of information collected during PE15-022 identified a total of 62 ball joint separation incidents, including 34 identified in ODI complaints and 31 identified in Mazda complaints and field reports (3 of the Mazda records involve vehicles/incidents that were also reported to ODI).When Mazda's design change was implemented, most of the field experience related to lower ball joints involved complaints of noise and premature wear-out.Only 1 of the ODI and 6 of the additional Mazda separation complaints identified in ODI's analysis were reported prior to January 2014.Significant increases in the number and trend in separation complaints were observed in 2015, when 30 of the ODI complaints and 16 of the additional Mazda complaints were reported.The report trend appears to be accelerating, with 29 of the reports received after ODI opened PE15-022 on June 9, 2015.There has been one crash reported to ODI related to the alleged defect (VOQ 10746510). This investigation is closed based on Mazda's recall.The 34 VOQs associated with this investigation are: 10747358, 10746510, 10744897, 10743509, 10736229, 10735938, 10734763, 10734302, 10734290, 10733813, 10732578, 10732217, 10732154, 10731850, 10730736, 10730280, 10730143, 10730114, 10726622, 10726480 10726448, 10726168, 10725839, 10725567, 10725488, 10725427, 10725390, 10717510, 10714469, 10695142, 10668978, 10648429, 10640541, 10546535
Crash-test ratings
2012 Mazda CX-9 SUV FWD NHTSA source
- Overall
- Not rated
- Frontal
- Not rated
- Side
- Not rated
- Rollover
2012 Mazda CX-9 SUV AWD NHTSA source
- Overall
- Not rated
- Frontal
- Not rated
- Side
- Not rated
- Rollover
Fuel economy by trim
| Trim | Engine | Drivetrain | Transmission | City | Hwy | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CX-9 4WD | 3.7L 6-cyl | 4-Wheel Drive | Automatic (S6) | 16 | 22 | 19 |
| CX-9 2WD | 3.7L 6-cyl | Front-Wheel Drive | Automatic (S6) | 17 | 24 | 19 |
EPA laboratory estimates by trim and engine. Actual mileage varies with driving, weather, load, and maintenance. EPA source.
Before you buy
Useful next checks
Federal records tell you about patterns. These checks can tell you more about the specific car in front of you.
These are affiliate links. TireKick may earn a fee if you use one.
Compare the year-by-year record
Open another year for its own evidence-gated decision. TireKick does not crown a best year from raw complaint totals.
2012 Mazda CX-9: frequently asked
What does the complaint record show for the 2012 Mazda CX-9?
Owners filed 221 NHTSA complaints about the 2012 Mazda CX-9. This is raw owner-reported complaint volume with no production or exposure normalization, so it is not a reliability score or a best/worst-year ranking.
What are the most common problems on the 2012 Mazda CX-9?
The most-reported problem areas are Service Brakes (59% of complaints) and air bags (10%).
How many recalls does the 2012 Mazda CX-9 have?
4 recalls have been issued that affect the 2012 Mazda CX-9, covering components such as air bags. Check the VIN with NHTSA and ask a dealer to confirm remedy eligibility; federal no-charge requirements have an age limit, though manufacturers may offer more coverage.
What gas mileage does the 2012 Mazda CX-9 get?
The EPA rates the 2012 Mazda CX-9 at 19 mpg combined.