TireKick

2019 Kia Soul · keep 3 yr

Configuration unresolved · configuration-scoped issues are withheld, never guessed.

Edit inputs
2019 Kia Soul
Image: Wikimedia Commons contributor · See source file
Insufficient evidenceEvidence: Insufficient

Insufficient evidence for a responsible candidate verdict.

Main regret risk

No named issue intersects your stated window.

Safer move

Subaru Crosstrek

Constraint-relaxed alternative with published authority evidence

Share this verdict

2019 Kia Soul · keep 3 yr

Insufficient evidenceEvidence: Insufficient

Main risk: No named issue intersects your stated window.

Text this verdict

The link and text carry only the car and non-sensitive context, never price, risk, or VIN.

Configuration applicability

Unresolved · not yet pinned

This model year was built in 4 reviewed configurations (2L Front-Wheel Drive; 1.6L Front-Wheel Drive); configuration-scoped findings can differ between them.

To verify: Enter the VIN, or read the engine/drivetrain from the door-jamb label or window sticker, to pin the exact configuration.

Ownership headache outlook

A responsible candidate scenario cannot be calculated until the missing evidence dimensions are resolved.

What each horizon reaches

  • 1 yrAbout 12,000 mi — before every named onset band.
  • 3 yr (yours)About 36,000 mi — before every named onset band.
  • 5 yrAbout 60,000 mi — before every named onset band.
12,000 annual miles · 3-year ownership horizon · Service history is unknown unless verified by the buyer. These are observed report bands, not failure probabilities.
Ownership-headache outlook: observed onset bands for each named issue.
IssueSeverityOnset p25MedianOnset p75Relation to your window
Loss Of Motive Power investigationModerate severity105,252 mi110,505 mi115,757 miOnset band is beyond your window

Why this answer

  1. 1Insufficient evidence: One or more named issues lacks the minimum usable evidence.

Conditions to clear first

  • Resolve the missing evidence dimension before treating this as a purchase recommendation.

Loss Of Motive Power investigation

official investigation record

Moderate severity
Whole generationSingle sourceEvidence: Limited confidence

The cited record is bound to model year 2019; no broader incidence claim is made.

Symptom
Loss of Motive Power The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) received a letter dated July 13, 2022, petitioning the Agency to initiate a safety defect investigation into loss of motive power allegations attributed to oil drain pan assembly failures on certain H
Why it matters
The official record identifies a condition that deserves candidate-specific inspection and record verification.

Observed complaint mileage band; not an incidence probability

Reported onset roughly 105,252115,757 mi (median 110,505 mi).

Onset band is beyond your window.

Based on 2 usable reports (4 censored). Complaint mileage is an observed report band, not a population incidence estimate.

What to inspect

  • Check the VIN for open NHTSA actions, then ask the inspector to test the named system and document the result.

Pro check: Independent pre-purchase inspection.

Mitigation

  • Treat the official record as a targeted inspection lead, not proof that this candidate has the condition.
1 evidence receiptShow ▾
clm_kia-soul-2019-investigation-investigation-dp22003-obs-46242019 Kia SoulEvidence: Limited confidence

The official record identifies a condition that deserves candidate-specific inspection and record verification.

“Loss of Motive Power The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) received a letter dated July 13, 2022, petitioning the Agency to initiate a safety defect investigation into loss of motive power allegations attributed to oil drain pan assembly failures on certain Hyundai Motor America, Inc. and Kia America, Inc. vehicles spanning Model Years (MY) 2005-2021. The Petitioners cited examples of complaints indicating that the subject vehicles were experiencing rapid loss of engine oil due to oil drain plug back outs, resulting in loss of motive power and/or catastrophic engine damage. Additional complaints were provided which alleged that the oil drain pans lack sufficient structural integrity and are susceptible to cracking. The petition itself can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI number 11481745. On September 12, 2022, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Defect Petition (DP22-003) to evaluate the Petitioners’ request. The Petitioners have provided additional complaints within four supplemental letters dated January 31, 2023, March 21, 2023, May 23, 2023, and August 4, 2023. ODI’s evaluation included the review and analysis of the complaints and supporting information submitted by the Petitioners, as well as additional complaints submitted directly to NHTSA which referenced either the oil drain plug or a crack in the oil pan. After reviewing the available data, ODI has not identified evidence that would support opening a defect investigation into the oil drain pan assemblies of the subject vehicles. Based on a review of the available information, a loss of motive power resulting from an oil drain plug back out has not occurred between the initial sale of a vehicle and the completion of its first oil change. If during an oil change service, a technician fails to remove the existing drain plug gasket before installing a new gasket, it is likely that a proper seal between the drain plug and the oil pan will not be made. An improper seal between the drain plug and oil pan could lead to the backing out on the drain plug, resulting in the sudden loss of oil while driving. Additionally, the provided examples of oil pan cracks were localized to the immediate vicinity of the oil drain plug and/or appeared to be the result of direct-contact with a tool during servicing.  There is no information to support that a vehicle-based defect exists relating to the oil pan assembly, and instead the documented incidents are related to the failure to follow the proper maintenance procedures during oil change service. In October 2023, Hyundai published a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) that provided detailed instructions for oil change service on its gasoline powered vehicles, specifically highlighting the need to remove and replace the existing drain plug gasket prior to reinstalling the drain plug. After a thorough review of the material submitted by the petitioner, the information already in NHTSA's possession, and the potential risks to motor vehicle safety implicated by the petitioners' allegations, NHTSA does not believe that a formal investigation is warranted. Therefore, the petition is denied. A Federal Register Notice (FRN) further detailing NHTSA’s reasons for denial of the petition will be published. The reference numbers for the complaints to NHTSA cited by the petitioner can be found in the petition submission documents in the public file for DP22-003. To review those complaints and the additional complaints ODI added to its evaluation which are cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.”
NHTSAinvestigationSep 2022Open source record

What would change this answer

verified remedy

A newly verified completed remedy with configuration-specific eligibility for Loss Of Motive Power investigation could improve the recommendation.

contradictory source

A reviewed official or independent source that materially contradicts the claims for Loss Of Motive Power investigation would force confidence and verdict review.

changed applicability

Reviewed evidence that includes or excludes a different year, engine, drivetrain, trim, or VIN population would change which issues apply.

lost exposure eligibility

A verified production denominator and eligible time-at-risk cohort are required before normalized comparative year guidance can strengthen.

Applied assumptions

  • · 12,000 annual miles
  • · 3-year ownership horizon
  • · Service history is unknown unless verified by the buyer.

Sharpen it further

  • Add mileage — it places the onset bands against your ownership window.
  • Add the asking price — it weighs the findings against what you would pay.
  • Set your annual miles — assumed 12,000; it sizes the window.
  • Choose a horizon — assumed 3 years; it sets the window length.

Better options

Inspection brief

Mark each check as you go. Progress saves on this device, works offline, and prints cleanly.

Saved on this device — no account needed. Copy link shares the safe URL only (no price, risk, or VIN).

Mark the checks to see where they point: a single Walk away outweighs the rest.

Ask the seller

  • Has any named issue here ever been diagnosed or repaired on this car?
  • Can I see the maintenance and any recall-remedy records?
  • Will you allow an independent pre-purchase inspection?

Records to request

  • Service and oil-change history
  • Completed recall / campaign paperwork
  • Any dealer diagnostic reports

Full evidence

Every conclusion above traces to one of these source records.

clm_kia-soul-2019-investigation-investigation-dp22003-obs-46242019 Kia SoulEvidence: Limited confidence

The official record identifies a condition that deserves candidate-specific inspection and record verification.

“Loss of Motive Power The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) received a letter dated July 13, 2022, petitioning the Agency to initiate a safety defect investigation into loss of motive power allegations attributed to oil drain pan assembly failures on certain Hyundai Motor America, Inc. and Kia America, Inc. vehicles spanning Model Years (MY) 2005-2021. The Petitioners cited examples of complaints indicating that the subject vehicles were experiencing rapid loss of engine oil due to oil drain plug back outs, resulting in loss of motive power and/or catastrophic engine damage. Additional complaints were provided which alleged that the oil drain pans lack sufficient structural integrity and are susceptible to cracking. The petition itself can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI number 11481745. On September 12, 2022, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Defect Petition (DP22-003) to evaluate the Petitioners’ request. The Petitioners have provided additional complaints within four supplemental letters dated January 31, 2023, March 21, 2023, May 23, 2023, and August 4, 2023. ODI’s evaluation included the review and analysis of the complaints and supporting information submitted by the Petitioners, as well as additional complaints submitted directly to NHTSA which referenced either the oil drain plug or a crack in the oil pan. After reviewing the available data, ODI has not identified evidence that would support opening a defect investigation into the oil drain pan assemblies of the subject vehicles. Based on a review of the available information, a loss of motive power resulting from an oil drain plug back out has not occurred between the initial sale of a vehicle and the completion of its first oil change. If during an oil change service, a technician fails to remove the existing drain plug gasket before installing a new gasket, it is likely that a proper seal between the drain plug and the oil pan will not be made. An improper seal between the drain plug and oil pan could lead to the backing out on the drain plug, resulting in the sudden loss of oil while driving. Additionally, the provided examples of oil pan cracks were localized to the immediate vicinity of the oil drain plug and/or appeared to be the result of direct-contact with a tool during servicing.  There is no information to support that a vehicle-based defect exists relating to the oil pan assembly, and instead the documented incidents are related to the failure to follow the proper maintenance procedures during oil change service. In October 2023, Hyundai published a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) that provided detailed instructions for oil change service on its gasoline powered vehicles, specifically highlighting the need to remove and replace the existing drain plug gasket prior to reinstalling the drain plug. After a thorough review of the material submitted by the petitioner, the information already in NHTSA's possession, and the potential risks to motor vehicle safety implicated by the petitioners' allegations, NHTSA does not believe that a formal investigation is warranted. Therefore, the petition is denied. A Federal Register Notice (FRN) further detailing NHTSA’s reasons for denial of the petition will be published. The reference numbers for the complaints to NHTSA cited by the petitioner can be found in the petition submission documents in the public file for DP22-003. To review those complaints and the additional complaints ODI added to its evaluation which are cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.”
NHTSAinvestigationSep 2022Open source record

What we could not verify

Every dimension is listed — including the ones we do not have — each with the concrete next step to close it.

  • ConfigurationPartial

    This model year was built in 4 reviewed configurations (2L Front-Wheel Drive; 1.6L Front-Wheel Drive); configuration-scoped findings can differ between them.

    Next: Enter the VIN, or read the engine/drivetrain from the door-jamb label or window sticker, to pin the exact configuration.

  • VIN recall & historyNot verified

    A VIN recall check was not handed to this page, so recall status and title/odometer history for this exact car are unchecked.

    Next: Run this VIN on NHTSA’s recall lookup and request a title/history report to confirm open recalls and past events.

  • Repair costNot verified

    No sourced repair-cost range is available for the named issues in this release.

    Next: Get a written repair estimate for the named issue from an independent shop before you negotiate.

  • Market price contextNot verified

    No asking price was entered and no licensed market-value feed is integrated, so price fairness is not assessed.

    Next: Compare the asking price against recent local listings for the same year and configuration.

  • Onset evidencePartial

    Onset bands rest on a limited number of usable reports; treat the band edges as approximate.

    Next: Weigh the onset band as a reported-onset range, not a failure probability, and confirm condition by inspection.

Coverage & methodology

Evidence: Insufficient— A required evidence dimension is missing.

6 of 5 expected sources present · methodology m1-v4-authority-cohort.

  • · Public complaints and recalls do not estimate failure probability.
  • · Observed mileage bands describe reported onset only.

Methodology m1-v4-authority-cohort →

2019 model-year authorityGeneration guide

Edit your inputs

Change a value and re-run — the answer updates and highlights what moved.

Optional context — each one sharpens the answer

No sign-up. Only these values travel in the link — never a VIN or notes.