TireKick

2022 Ford Edge · keep 3 yr

Configuration unresolved · configuration-scoped issues are withheld, never guessed.

Edit inputs
2022 Ford Edge
Image: Wikimedia Commons contributor · See source file
Insufficient evidenceEvidence: Insufficient

Insufficient evidence for a responsible candidate verdict.

Main regret risk

No named issue intersects your stated window.

Safer move

Ford Edge

Adjacent year in the same model line

Share this verdict

2022 Ford Edge · keep 3 yr

Insufficient evidenceEvidence: Insufficient

Main risk: No named issue intersects your stated window.

Text this verdict

The link and text carry only the car and non-sensitive context, never price, risk, or VIN.

Configuration applicability

Unresolved · not yet pinned

This model year was built in 3 reviewed configurations (2.7L All-Wheel Drive; 2L All-Wheel Drive); configuration-scoped findings can differ between them.

To verify: Enter the VIN, or read the engine/drivetrain from the door-jamb label or window sticker, to pin the exact configuration.

Ownership headache outlook

A responsible candidate scenario cannot be calculated until the missing evidence dimensions are resolved.

Most inspection-relevant: Loss Of Motive Power investigation — this is the issue to focus the pre-purchase inspection on.

What each horizon reaches

  • 1 yrAbout 12,000 mi — before every named onset band.
  • 3 yr (yours)About 36,000 mi — reaches the observed onset band for Loss Of Motive Power investigation, which your window is inside.
  • 5 yrAbout 60,000 mi — reaches the observed onset band for Loss Of Motive Power investigation, which your window is inside.
12,000 annual miles · 3-year ownership horizon · Service history is unknown unless verified by the buyer. These are observed report bands, not failure probabilities.
Ownership-headache outlook: observed onset bands for each named issue.
IssueSeverityOnset p25MedianOnset p75Relation to your window
Loss Of Motive Power investigationModerate severity18,758 mi37,505 mi56,253 miYour window enters the onset band

Why this answer

  1. 1Insufficient evidence: One or more named issues lacks the minimum usable evidence.

Conditions to clear first

  • Resolve the missing evidence dimension before treating this as a purchase recommendation.

Loss Of Motive Power investigation

official investigation record

Moderate severity
Whole generationSingle sourceEvidence: Limited confidence

The cited record is bound to model year 2022; no broader incidence claim is made.

Symptom
Loss of Motive Power On July 22, 2022, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) granted a Defect Petition (DP22001) and opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE22007) to investigate allegations of loss of motive power in model year (MY) 2021 Ford Bronco vehicles equipped with 2.7L Ec
Why it matters
The official record identifies a condition that deserves candidate-specific inspection and record verification.

Observed complaint mileage band; not an incidence probability

Reported onset roughly 18,75856,253 mi (median 37,505 mi).

Your window enters the onset band.

Based on 2 usable reports (4 censored). Complaint mileage is an observed report band, not a population incidence estimate.

What to inspect

  • Check the VIN for open NHTSA actions, then ask the inspector to test the named system and document the result.

Pro check: Independent pre-purchase inspection.

Mitigation

  • Treat the official record as a targeted inspection lead, not proof that this candidate has the condition.
1 evidence receiptShow ▾
clm_ford-edge-2022-investigation-investigation-ea23002-obs-53142022 Ford EdgeEvidence: Limited confidence

The official record identifies a condition that deserves candidate-specific inspection and record verification.

“Loss of Motive Power On July 22, 2022, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) granted a Defect Petition (DP22001) and opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE22007) to investigate allegations of loss of motive power in model year (MY) 2021 Ford Bronco vehicles equipped with 2.7L EcoBoost engines. Complainants were reporting sudden engine failure while driving resulting in a loss of motive power, often without the ability to restart. During PE22007, the cause of engine failure and loss of motive power in the subject vehicles was determined to be intake valve fracture, and the full scope of vehicles affected by the subject defect was identified as all MY 2021-2022 Ford and Lincoln models equipped with either the 2.7L or 3.0L EcoBoost engines, referred to as the “Nano” engine family.  If an intake valve fractures in the subject engines, it may drop into the cylinder and contact the piston, often resulting in catastrophic engine damage. On September 29, 2023, PE22007 was upgraded to an Engineering Analysis (EA23002) to further investigate the subject defect across the full scope of affected vehicles. During EA23002, ODI visited Ford facilities to review technical information related to intake valve fracture in “Nano” engines, coordinated with NHTSA’s Vehicle Research and Testing Center (VRTC), and analyzed updated field data relating the subject defect. Forensic analysis of fractured intake valves demonstrated that the defective components exhibited “grinding burn” or out of specification hardness in the area of the keeper grooves. The presence of grinding burn is evidence that during the groove grinding phase of production, the temperature of the valve became sufficiently high to alter the microstructure of the material and is indicative that the valve supplier’s manufacturing processes were not within control specifications. Grinding burn results in a hard, brittle microstructure and high residual stresses toward the surface of the valve. Through normal engine loading, a valve with grinding burn will likely fracture at the area of highest vulnerability, which is the third keeper groove. In its response to the EA23002 Information Request (IR) letter, Ford provided evidence of 396 customer complaints (including field reports), 825 warranty claims, and 936 engine exchanges. When considering both ODI and manufacturer failure report data, there have been reports representing 1066 unique vehicles within the subject vehicle population. Analysis of the failure report data demonstrates that vehicles equipped with potentially defective intake valves were built within a production “spike period” of May 2021 – October 2021. The beginning of the spike period corresponds to a ramp up in production at the valve supplier manufacturing facility, and the end of the spike period aligns with the implementation of several mid-production process improvements and the decision to change the metal alloy used to produce intake valves from “Silchrome Lite” to “Silchrome 1”. Ford began investigating the subject defect in July 2021, determined the root cause, and took corrective measures for the new production vehicles. Analysis of the failure report data demonstrates that these corrective actions were successful in eliminating the risk of intake valve fracture for subject vehicles produced after October 2021. However, Ford did not take any field action to address vehicles produced during the spike period, and in the several months following the implementation of the production changes, a significant number of field failures continued to occur. It is Ford’s assessment that not all valves produced during the spike period are defective, and that failures associated with the subject defect occur at low time in service. Analysis of the failure report data demonstrates that the vast majority of failures have occurred before 20,000 miles with over half of all reported failures occurring before 5,000 miles. The rate of reported failures related to the subject defect has steadily decreased since November 2021. ODI coordinated with NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA) to conduct statistical analysis and predict the number of future failures associated with the subject defect. The results of this analysis, and the trends identified through the failure report data are generally consistent with Ford’s assessment that defective intake valves will likely fail at a low time in service and indicate that the majority of subject vehicles equipped with defective valves have already experienced a failure. On August 23, 2024, Ford submitted recall 24V635 for subject vehicles equipped with “Nano” engines and built within the production spike period identified above (total population 90,736 vehicles). The remedy includes an inspection at a Ford/Lincoln dealership where the lifetime engine cycles of the vehicle will be determined. If a vehicle does not meet a threshold for lifetime engine cycles, the dealership will conduct a high RPM engine cycle accumulation procedure, which aims to identify if the vehicle is equipped with defective intake valves. Any vehicle that fails the accumulation procedure will receive an engine replacement under the recall. In addition to recall 24V635, Ford has stated that it will launch customer satisfaction campaign 24N12, which will provide extended warranty coverage to the subject vehicles through the earlier of 10 years or 150,000 miles. In view of the recall action being taken by Ford, ODI is closing this Engineering Analysis. To review the reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.”
NHTSAinvestigationSep 2023Open source record

What would change this answer

verified remedy

A newly verified completed remedy with configuration-specific eligibility for Loss Of Motive Power investigation could improve the recommendation.

contradictory source

A reviewed official or independent source that materially contradicts the claims for Loss Of Motive Power investigation would force confidence and verdict review.

changed applicability

Reviewed evidence that includes or excludes a different year, engine, drivetrain, trim, or VIN population would change which issues apply.

lost exposure eligibility

A verified production denominator and eligible time-at-risk cohort are required before normalized comparative year guidance can strengthen.

Applied assumptions

  • · 12,000 annual miles
  • · 3-year ownership horizon
  • · Service history is unknown unless verified by the buyer.

Sharpen it further

  • Add mileage — it places the onset bands against your ownership window.
  • Add the asking price — it weighs the findings against what you would pay.
  • Set your annual miles — assumed 12,000; it sizes the window.
  • Choose a horizon — assumed 3 years; it sets the window length.

Better options

Inspection brief

Mark each check as you go. Progress saves on this device, works offline, and prints cleanly.

Saved on this device — no account needed. Copy link shares the safe URL only (no price, risk, or VIN).

Mark the checks to see where they point: a single Walk away outweighs the rest.

Required checks

  • Check the VIN for open NHTSA actions, then ask the inspector to test the named system and document the result.

    Loss Of Motive Power investigation: Loss of Motive Power On July 22, 2022, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) granted a Defect Petition (DP22001) and opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE22007) to investigate allegations of loss of motive power in model year (MY) 2021 Ford Bronco vehicles equipped with 2.7L Ec

    Passes when: No matching symptom during inspection

    Test drive: On the test drive, watch for: loss of motive power on july 22, 2022, the office of defects investigation (odi) granted a defect petition (dp22001) and opened a preliminary evaluation (pe22007) to investigate allegations of loss of motive power in model year (my) 2021 ford bronco vehicles equipped with 2.7l ec.

    Specialist: Independent pre-purchase inspection

    Records to request: Service records showing this system was inspected or repaired

    Pass / Concern / Walk away

Ask the seller

  • Has any named issue here ever been diagnosed or repaired on this car?
  • Can I see the maintenance and any recall-remedy records?
  • Will you allow an independent pre-purchase inspection?

Records to request

  • Service and oil-change history
  • Completed recall / campaign paperwork
  • Any dealer diagnostic reports

Full evidence

Every conclusion above traces to one of these source records.

clm_ford-edge-2022-investigation-investigation-ea23002-obs-53142022 Ford EdgeEvidence: Limited confidence

The official record identifies a condition that deserves candidate-specific inspection and record verification.

“Loss of Motive Power On July 22, 2022, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) granted a Defect Petition (DP22001) and opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE22007) to investigate allegations of loss of motive power in model year (MY) 2021 Ford Bronco vehicles equipped with 2.7L EcoBoost engines. Complainants were reporting sudden engine failure while driving resulting in a loss of motive power, often without the ability to restart. During PE22007, the cause of engine failure and loss of motive power in the subject vehicles was determined to be intake valve fracture, and the full scope of vehicles affected by the subject defect was identified as all MY 2021-2022 Ford and Lincoln models equipped with either the 2.7L or 3.0L EcoBoost engines, referred to as the “Nano” engine family.  If an intake valve fractures in the subject engines, it may drop into the cylinder and contact the piston, often resulting in catastrophic engine damage. On September 29, 2023, PE22007 was upgraded to an Engineering Analysis (EA23002) to further investigate the subject defect across the full scope of affected vehicles. During EA23002, ODI visited Ford facilities to review technical information related to intake valve fracture in “Nano” engines, coordinated with NHTSA’s Vehicle Research and Testing Center (VRTC), and analyzed updated field data relating the subject defect. Forensic analysis of fractured intake valves demonstrated that the defective components exhibited “grinding burn” or out of specification hardness in the area of the keeper grooves. The presence of grinding burn is evidence that during the groove grinding phase of production, the temperature of the valve became sufficiently high to alter the microstructure of the material and is indicative that the valve supplier’s manufacturing processes were not within control specifications. Grinding burn results in a hard, brittle microstructure and high residual stresses toward the surface of the valve. Through normal engine loading, a valve with grinding burn will likely fracture at the area of highest vulnerability, which is the third keeper groove. In its response to the EA23002 Information Request (IR) letter, Ford provided evidence of 396 customer complaints (including field reports), 825 warranty claims, and 936 engine exchanges. When considering both ODI and manufacturer failure report data, there have been reports representing 1066 unique vehicles within the subject vehicle population. Analysis of the failure report data demonstrates that vehicles equipped with potentially defective intake valves were built within a production “spike period” of May 2021 – October 2021. The beginning of the spike period corresponds to a ramp up in production at the valve supplier manufacturing facility, and the end of the spike period aligns with the implementation of several mid-production process improvements and the decision to change the metal alloy used to produce intake valves from “Silchrome Lite” to “Silchrome 1”. Ford began investigating the subject defect in July 2021, determined the root cause, and took corrective measures for the new production vehicles. Analysis of the failure report data demonstrates that these corrective actions were successful in eliminating the risk of intake valve fracture for subject vehicles produced after October 2021. However, Ford did not take any field action to address vehicles produced during the spike period, and in the several months following the implementation of the production changes, a significant number of field failures continued to occur. It is Ford’s assessment that not all valves produced during the spike period are defective, and that failures associated with the subject defect occur at low time in service. Analysis of the failure report data demonstrates that the vast majority of failures have occurred before 20,000 miles with over half of all reported failures occurring before 5,000 miles. The rate of reported failures related to the subject defect has steadily decreased since November 2021. ODI coordinated with NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA) to conduct statistical analysis and predict the number of future failures associated with the subject defect. The results of this analysis, and the trends identified through the failure report data are generally consistent with Ford’s assessment that defective intake valves will likely fail at a low time in service and indicate that the majority of subject vehicles equipped with defective valves have already experienced a failure. On August 23, 2024, Ford submitted recall 24V635 for subject vehicles equipped with “Nano” engines and built within the production spike period identified above (total population 90,736 vehicles). The remedy includes an inspection at a Ford/Lincoln dealership where the lifetime engine cycles of the vehicle will be determined. If a vehicle does not meet a threshold for lifetime engine cycles, the dealership will conduct a high RPM engine cycle accumulation procedure, which aims to identify if the vehicle is equipped with defective intake valves. Any vehicle that fails the accumulation procedure will receive an engine replacement under the recall. In addition to recall 24V635, Ford has stated that it will launch customer satisfaction campaign 24N12, which will provide extended warranty coverage to the subject vehicles through the earlier of 10 years or 150,000 miles. In view of the recall action being taken by Ford, ODI is closing this Engineering Analysis. To review the reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.”
NHTSAinvestigationSep 2023Open source record

What we could not verify

Every dimension is listed — including the ones we do not have — each with the concrete next step to close it.

  • ConfigurationPartial

    This model year was built in 3 reviewed configurations (2.7L All-Wheel Drive; 2L All-Wheel Drive); configuration-scoped findings can differ between them.

    Next: Enter the VIN, or read the engine/drivetrain from the door-jamb label or window sticker, to pin the exact configuration.

  • VIN recall & historyNot verified

    A VIN recall check was not handed to this page, so recall status and title/odometer history for this exact car are unchecked.

    Next: Run this VIN on NHTSA’s recall lookup and request a title/history report to confirm open recalls and past events.

  • Repair costNot verified

    No sourced repair-cost range is available for the named issues in this release.

    Next: Get a written repair estimate for the named issue from an independent shop before you negotiate.

  • Market price contextNot verified

    No asking price was entered and no licensed market-value feed is integrated, so price fairness is not assessed.

    Next: Compare the asking price against recent local listings for the same year and configuration.

  • Onset evidencePartial

    Onset bands rest on a limited number of usable reports; treat the band edges as approximate.

    Next: Weigh the onset band as a reported-onset range, not a failure probability, and confirm condition by inspection.

Coverage & methodology

Evidence: Insufficient— A required evidence dimension is missing.

6 of 5 expected sources present · methodology m1-v4-authority-cohort.

  • · Public complaints and recalls do not estimate failure probability.
  • · Observed mileage bands describe reported onset only.

Methodology m1-v4-authority-cohort →

2022 model-year authorityGeneration guide

Edit your inputs

Change a value and re-run — the answer updates and highlights what moved.

Optional context — each one sharpens the answer

No sign-up. Only these values travel in the link — never a VIN or notes.